Saturday, 12 August 2017

Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy Harvesting

This is an old project I had started about a year ago that has since been discontinued. However I am more than happy to share information to the public. The circuit schematics are all available for download from the OSHPark site

Energy harvesting is a concept that essentially promises to have vast arrays of decentralized energy harvesting stations that can run everywhere and anywhere, operate independently and perhaps run devices such as Internet of things (IOT)  sensors that send data they collect to the internet in which it is in a centralized location for analysis.

The stations themselves are of largely 2 regimes - mobile and immobile. 

Mobile sensor stations would include as examples:
  • Wearable sensors (i.e. clothing, watches, belts, rings, bracelets, etc) 
  • Sensors for vehicles (i.e. tags or attachable modules for cars, motorcycles, bicycles, planes, drones, seafaring vehicles, etc)
Immobile sensor stations would include as examples:
  • Sensors for Data Reading Stations ( i.e. outdoor weather stations, climate control for buildings, etc)
  • Sensors for Appliances (washing machines, refrigerators, heating systems, etc)

In both regimes it is important to consider how to increase the autonomy of the sensor stations themselves. The field of ambient energy harvesting boasts to harvest available energy sources from the external environment and power the sensor stations themselves. In order for this to be effective, the energy harvesting must be multifaceted in order to combat the differences between different times of day and different times of year in order to work almost indefinitely. 

Multifaceted energy harvesting would work on the same basis of examining the most efficient forms of sustainable energy in the environment which make up the least amount of space and which are the least intermittent (i.e. the least amount of interruption expected in the overall energy supply).

Discussion of Solar and Wind as Energy Sources


By far, solar and wind make up the greatest energy source in an environment and require the least space. Moreover although both can be intermittent energy sources, both systems when hybridized can allow for a reasonable amount of compensation for the relative losses experienced in sun and wind as the conditions during the day and seasons change.

Powering an IOT module from a solar charged battery source is simple in terms of installation and the main obstacle is to make sure the solar panel and energy harvesting circuitry harvest energy even in low light levels. This can be accomplished with DC-DC upconverters and/or high quality, thin film solar panels.

The latest design for my energy harvesters uses the Linear Technology's LTC3105 for energy sources such as solar energy harvesting in low light levels. A PCB board was developed using OSHPark's online ordering service and assembled in my electronics lab.

The energy harvester is tested using a thin-film, flexible silicon solar cell, made by PowerFilm Inc., held in a picture frame.

When relying on solar energy as the power source, for northern and southern latitudes the seasonal dependence on sunlight is an obvious limiting factor on energy supply. The only way to combat this is by placing the solar panels as high as possible above the ground surface to avoid obstacles blocking the light.

The added benefit of power generation by solar energy lies with efficient tracking systems along with simply examining the relative light levels in an area where a solar powered device will be planted.


In order to harvest wind energy we require mechanical knowledge as well as electrical. There are many different wind turbine designs, however to be efficient the wind turbine must work in the direction the wind is blowing.

To do this it must either be designed to steer itself via, for example using a fin on the back of the nacelle, or be a vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) design that can move in any direction the wind blows. The VAWT design is better for small to medium wind turbine designs for use in energy harvesting.

Here is a video showing how the VAWT was tested using a different energy harvesting circuit that boosts an input DC voltage of 0.8V-5.0V to approximately 5.0V.

By placing the VAWT inside a commercial aluminium flag pole mount, we can in principle plant the wind turbine on almost any surface and point it in the direction of the prevailing wind to harvest power.

Wind energy collection is more subtle than solar in terms of the examination of its dependencies.  The amount of wind available to harvest as energy source at a given time is itself a consequence of the solar energy available in ways that are not so direct as PV solar energy harvesting.

Wind speeds at or near the surface generally decrease after sunset because at night the surface of the Earth cools much more rapidly than does the air above the surface.

As a result of this difference in cooling ability, it doesn’t take long for the ground to become colder than the air above it.

The air in close contact with the ground — say in the lowest 300 feet of the atmosphere — then becomes colder than the air above it.

This circumstance leads to the development of what is known as a temperature inversion. Inversions dramatically reduce the amount of mixing that occurs between different vertical layers of the atmosphere. As a consequence, once the inversion sets up (after sunset), it is much harder for fast-moving air above the ground to mix down to the surface, where it could appear as a gust of wind.

This is why fogs appear typically after sunset or before sunrise. The inversion prevents mixing that would disrupt the fog.

On a clear day when the sun is shining and is heating up the ground much more quickly than the air above it then air near the ground is heated more than the air above say 300 feet of atmosphere and it then becomes very easy for currents to form, as hot air rises and pushed cold air down, which in effect causes the air to mix and can form a cycle of surface gusts. This can be then harnessed by a surface windmill.

However, at sunset the ground will begin to cool rapidly and a temperature inversion will occur as the air at the surface cools faster than the more insulated air in the upper atmosphere. The winds will then be low or non-existent at night after a clear sunny day, in summer for example.

The ground always cools faster than the air but if the temperature inversion is negated somehow the winds will blow day or night.

In some cases cloud and temperature structures exist, in storms for example, that can often overrule the tendency for inversions to set up at night.

Low pressure systems can negate temperature inversions to set up at night by hot,moisture laden air rising from the surface. This frequently happens around large bodies of water. Water can retain the heat from the sun for a long time after sunset and can thus halt temperature inversion at night.

Late autumn and winter can also bring cold clouds and air in the upper atmosphere that counter the temperature inversion at night and create a relative inversion where the air in the upper atmosphere is even colder than the air near the surface even during low levels of lower atmospheric heating where the sun is not as intense in these colder seasons. Hence windy conditions are more common in autumn and winter.

Along coastlines air near the surface of the water can remain warmer for longer near the surface than would happen inland. Hence air will move from the relatively warmer coastline towards inland. This becomes particularly apparent in autumn and winter.

So, in general, if we can expect high levels of clear sunshine then we can expect low levels of wind, and if we can expect high levels of wind then we can say that sunlight will most likely be very dissipated, along with a lot of moving cloud cover.

Hence having a hybrid solar and wind system can cover a great deal of weather conditions for powering an IOT module as continuously as possible.

Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy Harvesting Station Prototype

The hybrid solar-wind powered unit showcased here uses an integrated solar panel, vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT), energy harvesting cricuitry and a 3.7V Lithium-Ion polymer battery incased within a hollow but strong and durable clear perspex tube.

The tube is clear for solar energy to be gathered inside the tube during the day and to function as a "light pipe" of sorts for an energy efficient LED for illumination purposes as a demonstration.

The system is designed to be integrated together by using a small thin film silicon solar panel that has been folded inside the cylindrical perspex tube so that it can gather light from any possible angle without the need for tracking.

Although this technique would be inefficient for conventional solar panels, the thin-film flexible solar panel can generate voltage from diffuse light hitting it from any direction, so that it can generate power from dawn to dusk by solar energy while the VAWT generator can provide a power source whenever the wind is blowing.

Altogether, this design saves on space for installation for a energy harvesting power source for use in lighting, USB device charging, small IOT sensor stations, signal boosters/repeaters and so forth.

We can even place the pipe in conventional fittings, such as commercially available aluminium flagpole mounts. that allow us to move the direction of the pipe to work at whatever angle we figure is to be the best for energy gathering.

The union between energy harvesting and IOT devices has several hurdles to jump across. Hopefully by examining and incorporating more ways to harvest energy from the surrounding environment these hurdles can be worked on by engineers who want to make, in essence, networks of self-powering, efficient and highly versatile electronics.

Monday, 10 July 2017

Who Truly Benefits from Science?

Science is often portrayed in media as a self-evidently benevolent enterprise. Moreover, it is constantly portrayed in mainstream media, both in news and popular documentaries, as a continuously and eternally progressing enterprise where each new development somehow brings us to a world of wonder and whimsy with external consequences which can be either ignored or simply adapted to.

Curiously, it is also assumed that the rate of progress in science is completely linear and that in the next 100 years we are told we shall see rates of progress greater than or equal to the progress seen last century. So it is said in virtually all media, both in fiction and fact contexts.

It is strange therefore to compare this idea to the cycles of growth, maturity, decay and decline seen in the record of history itself where we see complex, albeit not scientific, societies emerge, grow and decay as a matter of record. All complex societies as they growing inevitably require more resources, more specification of the roles of participants leading to less freedom and ultimately more methods of taxation to continue the standard the civilization reaches at optimum once resources have been exhausted beyond a certain critical point.

The scientific method is the basic definition of what science is as a function of acquired knowledge. However, as scientific culture inevitably grew more complex, so too did specialization emerge and in the vernacular use of the term science really means many different things to different people be it right or wrong. At the very least, to some science is experimentation, to others theory. Moreover in ordinary comprehension science can be presented as popular science or often as simply technical wizardry. Computer science for example is in reality engineering but to very many people computer technology is a science as an example, the same can be said of social science.

More troubling is that in this age the products of science, namely technical gadgets, are often so much lauded and are in so much abundance that they begin to eclipse the methods of science that produced them. Often technology produced by industry is used as a kind of logo equated with the "benevolent" visions of science. To the appearance of many therefore science and industry have merely become one and the same. Therefore, we might ask ourselves, who benefits from what is seen in the modern sense as "Science".

In much of my own experience over the last few years working in research and industry, science and physics in particular, appears to be mainly functioning as at best as a service for industry. Very little science is done that do not have direct applications to industry and the marketplace. In effect science has all but become a research and development wing for corporations, with very few exceptions.

The corporations involved with making profit from science have it very much their own way, with very little risk, which is one of the main advantages of corporate structure to begin with. As mentioned before, the banner of "science" being self-evidently benign is a strong dogma in the minds of the public and politicians with very few exceptions. Therefore many corporations can conduct their "scientific" R&D operations under a kind of saintly halo unless costly and time-consuming investigations are launched, which are rare.

Moreover, the image of science being a benign enterprise leads governments to directly fund scientific research out of taxpayer funds. Hence corporations can easily use taxpayer funding as a continuous resource to garner future profits for themselves based on new discoveries and new techniques painstakingly generated in the lab often by highly intelligent, but often institutionalized, hardworking scientists.

Furthermore, the apparently self-evidently benign image and prestige of scientists shown in the media also leads to a demand on universities to educate more in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, maths) without questioning why it is better to educate a young person to spend their time studying one subject over another without invoking the condition that "Subject A is more useful than subject B" -one question being "more useful to whom and to what?" - It is of obvious benefit to high tech multi-national corporations; The STEM educational system trains and educates their future workers and ensures future profit keeps flowing.

Opportunity of employment and empowerment with STEM, undoubtedly true, is often cited as the main reason why STEM is so popular a topic to discuss in the context of education. Interestingly though there is always an increasing demand for STEM graduates and a bemoaning of large dropout rates, particularly among engineering majors. If there is such a demand for STEM educated workers from the side of corporations above what students want to study and are capable of studying in college then it raises suspicions as to which party the educators are working in the best interests of.

Much of the modern scientific enterprise therefore has a troubling amount of cyclical reasoning behind it. Science is funded by working taxpayers, those workers are encouraged to study STEM by taxpayer funded education, the workers operate in STEM fields earn a salary which is then garnished to provide funding for future workers and developments. The future developments are real and do benefit people, but it can be a selective few. After all, it is still a market system that modern science and modern technology exists in and profits they make are increasingly in the hands of the many over the few. There are many in the over-exploited regions of the world today that not only do not benefit largely from much of the scientific progress but are burdened disproportionately by the consequences of pollution and the weapons systems science has created in a not-so-neutral fashion.

By and large we might live more prosperously than our ancestors have thanks to modern scientific developments but we have carried with that prosperity an enormous burden and put a tremendous strain on the limited resources of both fragile humans and the Earth to accomplish this. We might all have to ask ourselves, is science really beneficial to everyone equally?